1. Could you tell me about the background of the exhibition and how the process came about?
Our Membership Scheme is at
the core of our organisation at Photofusion. We have at present around
500 members, all of which are either practicing or professional working
artists. They range from students to professional working photographers,
and in celebration of the broad and varied talent within our membership
scheme, we have organised annual members' photography exhibitions.
"Photofusion
Salon 2012" was our fourth year of organising an exhibition for the
Members of Photofusion. In the past, around 15 artists were selected to
exhibit a recent body of work in the gallery, with a further 25 on an AV
showreel. However, due to the growing popularity of the event, we
wanted to be able to showcase a much larger selection of our Members'
work. Therefore, we decided to give the whole exhibition a new and
improved make over, by making it a Salon show. This enabled us to select
over 120 artists to exhibit on the walls of the gallery, and then
another 41 on a showreel.
2.
Could you please describe the selection and display process? (referring to framing, lighting, display and mount)
Members were invited to submit a body of up to 10 images, a statement
and a bio from a project that was completed in the last year. The
Photofusion Gallery Committee then went through the submissions and
selected the successful applicants to be in the show. One image was
selected from each successful submission. Due to the extremely high
standard of work that we received, we ended up letting through 160
prints to go on the gallery walls, and then a further 41 which went on
an AV showreel.
The
successful applicants chosen to exhibit on the gallery walls were then
given a maximum print allowance of 1m wide, and were allowed to exhibit
their work as they pleased - either framed, mounted or pinned/magnets.
We did not want to set restrictions on this, as that would defeat the
point of a Salon show. It was then at the curation stage that I had to
take into account the colours of frames etc. so as not to have too many
of the same hanging styles next to each other. The sizes of the prints
also ended up varying in size from 30cm to 1m, which definitely made the
task of curation more complicated.
In
the end, the prints were presented as a mixture of hangings and
frames/mounts and sizes, on all four walls of the gallery, covering them
from floor to ceiling.
3. What were the aims and objectives of the show? How well have you achieved them?
The
aim of this annual show is to offer our Members a platform on which
they can showcase their latest body of work. A handout was available
which had the website and email of each exhibitor, so that viewers could
view the rest of their work. There was also a catalogue which
accompanied the exhibition and contained short project statements for
each image exhibited.
Therefore,
overall I think that the initial aim to showcase the talent of the
Photofusion Membership scheme was successful, as was offering them a
platform on which to present their work. For some, this show was one of
their first, and so it offered them an insight into what goes in to
putting together a group show - which from their point of view involved
how they wanted their work to be presented within the gallery, getting
it printed and framed, and writing their own biography/artist
statement. For the other more experienced photographers, this show gave
them the opportunity to showcase a more recent body of work, to gain
more exposure, to network, and potentially make some sales/new clients.
Overall, this annual exhibition brought all our Members together,
allowing them to network and gain professional exposure.
4. Was there anything you wish you had done differently?
After having gone through the stressful curation of this year's show
with 160 prints, I now know to limit the number of prints for the
gallery walls for next year. We were close to not being able to fit all
of the prints in on the walls, therefore next year I will limit the
number of successful applicants allowed through to approximately 120.
5. Could you please describe the curatorial process in 1 sentence/phrase?
The curatorial process was extremely challenging with a wide range of
themes, aesthetics, framings/hangings to consider in quite a small
gallery space, however, the outcome was an exciting and inspirational
photography exhibition.
No comments:
Post a Comment